TRUMP HUSH MONEY CRIMINAL CASE

1. Is it unfair, unjust or biased for a judge to issue a gag order on a defendant in a criminal case but not on the star witness? Example: Judge Merchan issued multiple gag orders on defendant President Trump who is the leading presidential candidate but not on prosecution star witness Michael Cohen, a convicted felon?

2. Is there impropriety or appearance of impropriety when a judge allows a prosecution witness such as a prominent porn actress and pornographic movie producer-director named Stormy Daniels to describe in lurid details before the jury her alleged sexual tryst with Trump that is definitely no relevance to the criminal charge?

3. Is there a political bias or even a tinge of political partiality when Judge Merchan, a Biden political donor whose daughter creates digital political promotions for Democrat Party candidates, failed to recuse himself from presiding over a criminal case initiated by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, an elected Democrat County District Attorney, who campaigned with a mission to get Trump?

Fellow Americans: If the answer is YES to the above three issues, perhaps the NYS commission on Judicial Conduct may be interested to hear a complaint.